A Catholic Case Against “Gay Marriage”

December 16, 2008 by  
Filed under Patrick's Blog

Dr. Mark Lowery is a Catholic moral theologian at the University of Dallas. In this article, which originally appeared in Envoy Magazine.  I hope you find it helpful in your own efforts to understand and explain this issue.


The Knot That Can’t Be Tied: Secular, Natural, and Sacramental Marriage

By Mark Lowery, Ph.D.

MAN’S SEXUAL ENERGIES are of extraordinary power and complexity. Is this energy something we can use however we wish, or is there some objective standard to which this energy should be conformed?

The Western tradition, like many other traditions, has consistently held that there is such an objective standard, and it is the reality called “marriage.” Today, however, many think that marriage can be whatever they want it to be. Instead of seeing marriage as an objective reality to which we align ourselves, it is seen as something that must conform to our notions and desires. Let’s call this perspective on marriage “secular marriage.”

Here’s an example of the “secular marriage” mindset. Jessie Bernard, in The Future of Marriage, describes marriage as follows:

“Both of us commit ourselves to: 1) continue to grow, each in his or her unique way; 2) retain future choices about our relationship, recognizing that the risks of growth include the risks of growing apart; 3) give room for the process of growing; 4) provide a climate that stimulates and invites growing; 5) take risks; 6) respect differences of belief or viewpoint. . . .”

According to this scheme, marriage is what one wishes it to be. All the criteria Bernard lists are subjective, and there is no hint that, by marrying, the spouses are entering into a permanent reality. It’s exactly this type of subjective misunderstanding of marriage that sets the stage for recent political and legislative efforts to legitimize homosexual relationships under the guise of marriage.

How can we effectively respond to those who promote the notion of “secular marriage,” and how can we demonstrate that marriage is an objective reality? One method is to rely on the evidence we see in God’s divine revelation. As important as such a method is, however, because of the separation of church and state we cannot base civil laws on any particular religion’s understanding of God’s revelation.

There are many people these days who deny that there are any objective truths at all, whether knowable by reason or revelation, so using religious explanations alone isn’t always sufficient to make your case.

The purpose of this article is to lay out a five-step argument about the nature of marriage, with the specific aim of showing why homosexuality (and homosexual “marriage”) is incompatible with that objective reality. . . (continue reading this article at www.envoymagazine.com; all rights reserved. If you wish to post a link to this article, please include a live link to Envoy‘s site).

What do you think of this post?
  • interesting (0)
  • cool (0)
  • funny (0)
  • wow (0)
  • pshaw! (0)

Enter the Conversation...

2 Responses to “A Catholic Case Against “Gay Marriage””
  1. The more and more I see the shameless, arrogant, tyrannical and vicious display of sin as a parade of PRIDE on the media and everywhere, the more and more I think that the Tree Of Knowledge in the Garden of Eden was not a forbidden Tree of knowledge as much as a Tree of absolute REALITY.

    God forbade man and woman to attempt to change reality to assure their eternal happiness, expansion and growth. Through all of history, but now more today, we humans have attempted to create millions of fantasy worlds of belief and behavior, not for entertainment in this case, but to accomodate sin and perversion.

    Behold therefore homosexuality, transgendersim, transhumanism, atheism, New Age, etc. Only Jesus can free us from demonic, emotionaly addictive, destructive fantasy and into godly REALITY, where our TRUE happiness awaits.

  2. jzepi says:

    If you were going to put this article’s ideas on a bumper-sticker, might it go something like:

    HETEROSEXUALITY IS OBJECTIVELY SUPERIOR TO HOMOSEXUALITY

    ?

    Is this perhaps something that everybody who is against re-defining marriage knows but is afraid to say because they don’t know how to say it without sounding mean?

    And is that perhaps why in the bumper-sticker world of American discourse we seem to be losing – i.e. the idea of re-defining marriage is seemingly gaining ground with the public?

Share Your Thoughts...

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar for free here!
Comments are moderated and may not appear immediately...